subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Fri, Dec 05 2008 

Published October 03, 2008 04:13 pm - Mercer County commissioners’ development plan is off to a dubious start following the purchase of formerly strip-mined land that has turned out to be unstable.


OUR VIEW: Strategy 1000 soil test gives taxpayers a sinking feeling


The Herald

Normally when you talk about strategy, you talk about a well laid-out plan, where you cover all the bases and give yourself the best opportunity to reach your goal.

In that case, the term “Strategy 1000” is obviously a misnomer.

Strategy 1000 was drafted in 2003 to get land ready for sale to businesses that may want to come to Mercer County. It was put into effect last December when commissioners bought land near the junction of Interstate 80 and U.S. Route 19 in East Lackawannock Township for a tidy price of $705,000.

At the time some people scratched their heads. The county was paying more than $3,000 an acre for former strip-mine property. Normally, your average business owner isn’t about to spend a lot of money on that kind of land.

While the commissioners felt it was a prime parcel for future development, some thought the price was too high. But at the time, we were willing to give the commissioners the benefit of the doubt.

Here’s the kicker, which we learned about a short time later: The land was purchased without proper environmental assessments.

Who allowed that to happen?

When you are spending that kind of taxpayers’ money, shouldn’t there be some strategy involved to assure the property was up to snuff before you bought it? Shouldn’t that be the terms of any contract?

The commissioners revealed this past week that a stability study of the 218 acres showed that the ground is unstable. It contains buried cement chunks and construction debris. That means the soil could sink to different levels.

Now that’s not necessarily a problem if you don’t mind that any building you put there might later break in half.

Commissioner Brian Beader, who voted for the purchase, said: “...it’s just a matter of how much money you may have to spend as far as stabilizing a foundation.”

And just who is that “you” to whom Beader is referring? Probably us — the taxpayers.

Beader said there is a compaction process that involves dropping a heavy weight from a crane to firm up property. Really. Just how much is that going to cost us?

If the county pays for it, it just might be a case of throwing good money after bad. After all, if you were a potential buyer, would you trust that compaction would actually do the job properly?

On top of that, there are no sewer or water hookups near that property. Throw in the fact that parts of it can’t be used for about 5 years because it’s leased to a gravel company and you have a real quandary.



print this story    email this story    comment on this story   

Click to discuss this story with other readers on our forums.




monster
autoconx
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide

Have a question for The Herald?
You are only one click away

Premier Guide
Premium Jobs

Friday, Dec. 5
Busy Chiropractic office needs exercise/ therapy assistant, 4 days per week. Send cover letter, resume and 3 business re...>MORE

See all ads

Premium Autos

See all ads

Premium Homes

See all ads

Premium Extras

See all ads


   

 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2008. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index