subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Thu, Mar 18 2010 

Resources

print this story   Print this story
  Post to del.icio.us

Published June 15, 2009 09:33 pm - An appeals court has agreed that a local judge should not have declared a mistrial in the case of a man convicted of drunken driving.

UPDATE: Court upholds DUI conviction


By Joe Pinchot
Herald Staff Writer

SHENANGO VALLEY

An appeals court has agreed that a local judge should not have declared a mistrial in the case of a man convicted of drunken driving.

Randall J. Walter, 39, of Sharon, was arrested June 6, 2007, by Sharpsville police patrolman Matthew Sharp for driving a car with an expired inspection sticker, according to Mercer County Common Pleas Court Judge Christopher J. St. John.

Walter was found guilty by a jury of drunken driving-second offense, and two traffic violations. St. John sentenced Walter to 90 days to 2 years in Mercer County Jail, three years of state probation, and to pay fines.

Walter has served his jail term.

In his appeal, Walter, represented by Assistant Mercer County Public Defender James Goodwin, said St. John should not have allowed prosecutors to question Sharp about his familiarity with Walter. Sharp said Walter walked, talked and looked differently that night than he had on other nights when he had seen Walter.

Walter’s attorney objected, saying the questioning left the jurors with the impression that Walter had committed previous crimes.

St. John said the questioning objected to was a follow-up to similar questions that were not objected to.

“You let the cat out of the bag a long time ago when you didn’t object on direct examination,” St. John said at a sidebar conference with attorneys.

St. John added that Sharp’s testimony was about seeing Walter “generally in the community and does not create any inference of prior criminal activity.”

Walter also argued that there was insufficient evidence to convict him.

St. John said the issue came down to whether the jurors believed that Walter’s drinking three, 16-ounce beers rendered him incapable of driving.

Walter failed roadside sobriety tests but refused to have a blood test conducted.

“The jury obviously disregarded the self-serving testimony of (Walter,) who claimed that the alcohol did not impair his ability to drive,” St. John said.

A three-judge panel of Superior Court affirmed St. John’s decisions in an opinion filed June 5.



print this story    email this story   




Have a question
for The Herald?
You are only a click away




autoconx
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Premier Guide
Premium Jobs

Thursday, March 18
AUTO MECHANIC
Hospitalization,
Excellent Wages,
Retirement Plan, Paid
Holidays, Dental Plan.
...>MORE

See all ads

Premium Deals

See all ads

Premium Homes

Thursday, March 18
All appliances included 3 bdrm. bungalow, fenced yard, Sharon, Move in ready. Owner relocated $29,500 neg. 724-931-0457<...>MORE

See all ads

Premium Work Wanted

See all ads


 

 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2009. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index