Published April 21, 2008 12:28 am - It’s crunch time for the four Erie-based Democrats vying for the chance to go one-one with seven-term Republican incumbent U.S. Rep. Phil English.
The candidates need to win votes not only in their hometown, but other 3rd Congressional District areas — including Mercer County, the district’s second-largest Democratic stronghold — to secure the party’s nomination on Tuesday.
VOTERS GUIDE: Four seek a shot at English
Democrats to select challenger
By Matt Snyder
Herald Staff Writer
3rd DISTRICT
—
It’s crunch time for the four Erie-based Democrats vying for the chance to go one-one with seven-term Republican incumbent U.S. Rep. Phil English.
The candidates need to win votes not only in their hometown, but other 3rd Congressional District areas — including Mercer County, the district’s second-largest Democratic stronghold — to secure the party’s nomination on Tuesday.
The winner, unlike others who have gone up against English in year’s past, could have a real chance thanks to a national Democratic tailwind and promises of party financial support against the 14-year member of Congress.
The candidates include Erie County Councilman Kyle Foust, attorney Tom Myers, lay-minister Mike Waltner, and businesswoman Kathy Dahlkemper.
The top issues thrown around by the Democrats this year are economic policy, health care reform and ending the war in Iraq.
Every candidate has been clear that they oppose the North American Free Trade Agreement in its present form, and think the United States should only freely trade with partners willing to meet labor and environmental regulations — an equal footing, or “fair trade” policy.
When NAFTA was passed, Waltner said, it was intended to spur the growth of a middle class in foreign countries. “It just never happened,” he said. “It became a race to the bottom.”
On health care, every Democrat wants to push for universal coverage. However, most expect to work on reforms that would expand health insurance to cover everyone and prohibit insurers from denying coverage to people based on pre-existing conditions.
Under such a system, people would also be able to keep their present coverage if they’re happy with it.
Waltner backs a single-payer system, similar to what is used in Canada or Europe. In such a system, health care is paid for by the government and not insurance companies.
Myers, Mrs. Dahlkemper and Foust all agreed that the political will for single-payer probably isn’t there. They said they would vote for it, but doubted it had a shot.
“It’s been knocked down pretty solidly,” Mrs. Dahlkemper said, in reference to failed efforts in the early 1990s to enact such a plan.
Waltner said the fear of single-payer comes from the idea that smaller government is always better. “The government does do some things better,” he said.
He said he would be a strong advocate for single-payer.
Most of the Democrats have stressed that they were opposed to the Iraq war from the start, and they all favor a phased withdrawal of American forces.